Talmud Builders
    Part ג

    The Verb System & Five Binyanim

    Full paradigms for Peal, Pael, Aphel, Itpeel and Itpaal — plus weak verbs and compound forms.

    ו

    The Verb System - Five Binyanim

    The Aramaic verb system has five major binyanim:

    BinyanMeaningExample
    פְּעַל (peal)simple activeאֲמַר - אמר
    פַּעֵל (pael)intensiveקַיֵּם - קיים
    אַפְעֵל (aphel)causativeאַחְזֵי - הראה
    אִתְפְּעֵל (itpeel)passive of pealאִתְּמַר - נאמר
    אִתְפַּעַל (itpaal)passive of paelאִתְקַיַּם - התקיים
    Two additional binyanim - שַׁפְעֵל and פַּלְפֵּל - appear in later strata.
    ז

    Paradigms of the Five Binyanim (root q-t-l)

    Pick a binyan and see its full inflection — perfect, imperfect, participle, imperative and infinitive — on the model root q-t-l. All binyanim share one skeleton; only prefixes and vowels shift.

    Simple active — the base binyan; most sugya verbs belong to it.

    PersonPerfectImperfect
    3msקְטַללִיקְטוֹל / נִיקְטוֹל
    3fsקְטַלָא / קְטַלתִּיקְטוֹל
    2msקְטַלְתְּתִּיקְטוֹל
    1csקְטַלִי / קְטַלְנָאאֶיקְטוֹל
    3mpקְטַלוּלִיקְטְלוּ(ן)
    2mpקְטַלְתּוּתִּיקְטְלוּ(ן)
    1cpקְטַלִינַןנִיקְטוֹל
    FormInflection
    Active participleקָטֵיל · קָטְלָא · קָטְלִי · קָטְלָן
    Passive participleקְטִיל · קְטִילָא · קְטִילִי
    Imperativeקְטוֹל · קְטוֹלוּ
    Infinitiveמִיקְטַל / לְמִיקְטַל
    In the Talmudאֲמַר "said" · חֲזָא "saw" · תְּנָא "taught" · יְדַע "knew"
    אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: הֲלָכָה כְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה

    Two Peal perfects (אָמַר · אָמַר) forming a transmission chain: Rav Yehuda reports in the name of Shmuel. No suffix, therefore no indirect object.

    Berakhot 9a · read the daf
    Quick practice
    Babylonian Aramaic imperfect typically begins with לִ־ or נִ־ (not יִ־ as in Hebrew): לֵימָא ("he will say"), לֵיכוּל ("he will eat"). A clear identifier.
    ח

    Weak Verbs

    Roots with a weak radical (א, ה, ו, י) and geminate roots inflect with characteristic shifts. Main classes:

    ClassExampleNote
    פ"אאֲמַר → לֵימָאInitial א elides
    פ"ייְדַע → לֵידַעInitial י drops
    ע"ו / ע"יקָם · מִית · דָּןLong base vowel
    ל"אמְצָא · קְרָאFinal א = ָ
    ל"יחֲזָא · בְּעָא · רְמָאInflects like ל"א
    geminateעָל · נָח · תַּבCompensatory dagesh
    ט

    Tenses

    Talmudic Aramaic distinguishes past, imperfect, imperative, participle (present), and infinitive (often prefixed with מ־ / לְ־).

    Example
    past 3msאֲמַר
    impf 1sאֵימָא
    imperativeאֵימָא!
    participle mאָמַר
    infinitiveלְמֵימַר
    ט׳

    Hava, Qa & Compound Forms

    The key to tense in a sugya is not the isolated verb but the compound: participle + הֲוָה, or participle + קָא. These add aspect — progressive, habitual, or narrative background.

    CompoundSenseExample
    קָא + בינוניProgressive presentקָא אָמַר · קָאָמְרִי
    הֲוָה + בינוניPast progressive / habitualהֲוָה יָתֵיב · הֲווֹ אָמְרִי
    הֲוָה + עברPluperfectהֲוָה אֲמַר
    לֶיהְוֵיLet it be / it will beלֶיהְוֵי · תֶּיהְוֵי
    אִי הֲוָהCounterfactualאִי הֲוָה תָּנֵי
    רַב הֲוָה יָתֵיב קַמֵּיהּ דְּרַבִּי, קָא מְנַמְנֵם

    "הֲוָה יָתֵיב" = he was sitting (past progressive); "קָא מְנַמְנֵם" = he was dozing. Together the two compounds build a scene rather than a list of actions.

    Berakhot 25a · read the daf
    A common error: rendering קָא אָמַר as "he said". The קָא is not decorative — it marks speech happening now within the discussion, and often signals an implicit question ("what is he getting at?").
    י

    Infinitive & Verbal Noun

    The Peal infinitive is built with מֵי־ / לְמֵי־ (לְמֵימַר, לְמֵיתַב); the derived binyanim use מ־ plus ־וּיֵי (לְקַיּוּמֵי, לְאַשְׁמוּעֵי). This form carries much of the sugya’s argumentative work.

    BinyanInfinitiveUse in the sugya
    פְּעַללְמֵימַרמַאי אִיכָּא לְמֵימַר — what is there to say?
    פַּעֵללְקַיּוּמֵיTo uphold a reading
    אַפְעֵללְאַשְׁמוּעֵיTo convey a novelty
    אִתְפְּעֵללְאִיתּוֹקְמֵיTo be construed