Shulchan Arukh Orach Chayim · Siman 439
Shulchan Arukh Orach Chayim 439 — English translation
Translation: Sefaria Community Translation. Section numbers match the Hebrew text above.
- 1The Law Concerning One Who Checked and Did Not Find the Number of Loaves He Had Left. Containing 4 Paragraphs: Nine piles of matza, and one of chametz, and a mouse comes and takes [from the piles] and we do not know if the mouse took chametz or matza, and the mouse entered a checked house - you must return and check it (however, if the food is small enough that the mouse could have eaten it - we can rely on a leniency that the mouse did eat it, and you do not need to check) (Tur), as every established place is like a half of a half [i.e. each established location is treated as its own majority]. If the food was separated from its established place, and the mouse took it from there - you do not need to return and check it, as anything separated [is considered to be] separated from the majority.
- 2If there are two piles, one of chametz and one of matzah, and two houses, one that was checked and one that was not, and two mice came — one took chametz, and one took matzah — and we do not know which mouse entered which house: Or if both houses were checked and there was one pile of chametz, and a mouse came and took from it, and it is not known into which house it entered; Or even if we know it entered one of them, and someone entered after it and checked and found nothing, Or he checked part of the house and found a loaf, In all these cases, there is no need to recheck the house. (These are the words of the Rambam, but the conclusion of later halakhic authorities is not in agreement with him.)
- 3If one left nine loaves of chametz and found ten, he must check for all nine, because we say that what he left was taken, and these are others (i.e., new ones). Similarly, if he left ten and found nine, he must check for all ten. But some say this only applies when the loaves were tied together, but if they were not tied, he only needs to check for the one that is missing or added.
- 4If he left chametz in one corner and found it in another corner, he must recheck the house.
License: CC0
דין מי שבדק ולא מצא מספר ככרות שהניח. ובו ד סעיפים:
ט' ציבורין של מצה וא' של חמץ ובא עכבר ונטל ולא ידענו אם נטל חמץ או אם נטל מצה ונכנס לבית בדוק צריך לחזור ולבדקו (מיהו אם הככר קטן שיכול העכבר לאכול תלינן להקל שאכלו וא"צ לבדוק (טור) שכל הקבוע כמחצה על מחצה ואם פירש הככר ממקום קביעתו ונטלו העכבר משם א"צ לחזור ולבדוק דכל דפריש מרובא פריש:
ב' צבורין א' של חמץ וא' של מצה ושני בתים א' בדוק ואחד שאינו בדוק ובאו שני עכברים זה נטל חמץ וזה נטל מצה ואין ידוע לאיזה בית נכנס זה שנטל החמץ וכן ב' בתים בדוקים וצבור א' של חמץ ובא עכבר ונטל ואין ידוע לאיזה בית נכנס או שידע שנכנס לא' מהם ונכנס אחריו ובדק ולא מצא כלום או שבדק קצת מהבית ומצא ככר אינו צריך לחזור ולבדוק (כך הם דברי הרמב"ם אבל מסקנת הפוסקים אינו כן):
הניח ט' ככרות חמץ ומצא י' צריך לבדוק אחר כל הט' וכן אם הניח י' ומצא ט' צריך לבדוק אחר כל הי' שאנו אומרים מה שהניח נטל ואלו אחרים הם ויש אומרים דהני מילי בקשורים יחד אבל אם אינם קשורי' יחד אין צריך לבדוק אלא אחר האחד:
הניח חמץ בזויות זו ומצאו בזויות אחרת צריך לחזור ולבדוק:
Orach Chayim Siman 439
Orach Chayim Siman 439 is a source-text unit from the Shulchan Arukh with 4 seifim. Its reading map separates the practical rule, its conditions and the points that need comparison with the surrounding text.
Open the full commentary pageWhat to track
Read each seif as a separate step. Identify the action, the condition that limits it and any distinction between cases before moving to the next seif.
Study lens
Look for a turn toward a more precise resolution. The source text remains the primary evidence; this note offers a structured way to enter it rather than replacing close reading.
- a turn toward a more precise resolution
Continue the sequence
Parallel sources
Lessons and study tools
A unit-by-unit map of all 4 seifim on this page: opening words, the moves the text actually makes and a link back to that exact seif.
Smart source finder
Type a reference or pick tractate, book or part and the exact unit — the finder resolves it to a page on this site and shows which sages cite it.
Resolved to: Shulchan Arukh Orach Chayim 439
Open in the reader