Chapter 1 · Chamesh Esreh Nashim

Positive and negative commands: limits of analogy

Lesson 2 of 51 25 min

While examining yibum and prohibitions, the Gemara tests whether honoring a parent can model overriding a prohibition.

Lesson goals

01Decode the source and its key terms.
02Explain the distinction and its limits.
03Apply the reasoning in a study exercise.

Source and decoding — Yevamot 6a

Yevamot 6a

דְּתַנְיָא, יָכוֹל אָמַר לוֹ אָבִיו: הִיטַּמֵּא, אוֹ שֶׁאָמַר לוֹ: אַל תַּחְזִיר, יָכוֹל יִשְׁמַע לוֹ? תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר: ״אִישׁ אִמּוֹ וְאָבִיו תִּירָאוּ וְאֶת שַׁבְּתוֹתַי תִּשְׁמוֹרוּ״, כּוּלְּכֶם חַיָּיבִין בִּכְבוֹדִי.

The baraita asks whether to obey a father who requests ritual defilement or non-return of lost property. The verse teaches that parent and child alike owe honor to God.

“Could it be” introduces a possibility, not a conclusion; “the verse teaches” limits it. The continuation rejects the analogy because of “preparation for a mitzvah”: preparation need not be performance of the command itself. This does not imply that every positive command overrides every prohibition.

Building the reasoning

1Identify the proposed obedience and the verse limiting it.
2Explain how “all of you” includes the parent.
3Read “preparation for a mitzvah” below and explain why the analogy proves no unrestricted rule.

Insight

This lesson is a study framework, not a halachic ruling. Check the sources and bring practical questions to a qualified rabbi.

Terms to decode

יכול

introduces a possibility to test

תלמוד לומר

introduces scriptural evidence

הכשר מצוה

preparation for a commandment

Before moving on

Insight

This lesson is a study framework, not a halachic ruling. Check the sources and bring practical questions to a qualified rabbi.

The sugya's flow - from Mishnah to conclusion

01·Mishnah / Baraita
The baraita teaches that a parent’s instruction to become impure or withhold a lost item does not override everyone’s obligation to honor God.
02·The Gemara asks
The Gemara asks why this does not establish that a positive command cannot override a prohibition.
03·Kushya
Limiting the argument to Shabbat prohibitions fails because the baraita also concerns other prohibitions.
04·Terutz
The Gemara rejects the analogy because these cases involve preparation for a mitzvah.
05·Raya
The attempt to learn from building the Temple is also rejected by distinguishing preparation from performing the mitzvah.
06·Conclusion of the sugya
The analogies do not prove the proposed rule, and the Temple verse is assigned to a teaching about reverence for the sanctuary.

Practice

Make a table: proposal, verse, baraita’s conclusion, and subsequent rejection of the analogy. Answer: all owe honor to God; preparation is not evidence for every conflict of commands.

Lesson wrap-up

Ask both what a source teaches and how far its analogy extends.

Check your understanding

Test yourself before marking the lesson complete.

Question 1 of 4

What does the baraita test?

Previous lessonFifteen women exempt their co-wives

Next lesson"Lo titgodedu" - do not form factions