Talmud Builders

    Commentary page

    Shulchan Arukh, Yoreh De'ah 383

    This page gathers the commentary on one source unit: the classic commentaries as they are printed, the sources the text cites, the sages named in it and direct links back to the text.

    Read the full text in the reader
    Shulchan Arukh · source analysis

    Yoreh De'ah Siman 383

    Yoreh De'ah Siman 383 is a source-text unit from the Shulchan Arukh with 2 seifim. Its reading map separates the practical rule, its conditions and the points that need comparison with the surrounding text.

    What to track

    Read each seif as a separate step. Identify the action, the condition that limits it and any distinction between cases before moving to the next seif.

    Study lens

    Look for rabbinic statements and attributed teachings, a turn toward a more precise resolution, Shabbat law and sacred time. The source text remains the primary evidence; this note offers a structured way to enter it rather than replacing close reading.

    • rabbinic statements and attributed teachings
    • a turn toward a more precise resolution
    • Shabbat law and sacred time

    A unit-by-unit map of all 2 seifim on this page: opening words, the moves the text actually makes and a link back to that exact seif.

    1. Seif 162 words

      Opens “איסור תשמיש המטה לאבל. ובו ב' סעיפים:…”

      Named: רבה.

    2. Seif 288 words

      Opens “במה דברים אמורים בשאר אבלות אבל אם…”

    Original text

    <b>איסור תשמיש המטה לאבל. ובו ב' סעיפים:</b><br>אבל אסור בתשמיש המטה אבל בשאר דבר קורבה מותר אפילו במזיגת הכוס והצעת המטה והרחצת פניו ידיו ורגליו בין באבילות דידיה בין באבילות דידה (אבל חבוק ונשוק יש להחמיר) (רבינו ירוחם) ומותרת לאכול עמו בקערה ומותר' לישן עמו הוא בבגדו והיא בבגדה ומיהו משום לך לך אמרינן נזירא יש להחמיר שלא יישן [עמה] במטה כלל:

    A mourner is forbidden marital intercourse, (II Sam. XII, 24) whence we infer that during the period of mourning it was forbidden. but any other type of contact is permissible, [namely], even the mixing of the cup [for him], making the bed [for him] and washing his face, hands or feet, [irrespective] whether it is his mourning or her mourning [that is being observed]. on the authority of RaBaD , derived from Ket. 4b. Cf. supra § 342 and notes. Perisha states that there is greater apprehension during the observance of her mourning, since he is prone to be tempted. ShaK , on the other hand, maintains that there is, contra Perisha , more fear that during his observance of mourning rites, he might be tempted, and she would obey his wish. Shitah Mek. (Ket. ibid .). cites a number of authorities whose explanation is similar to that of Perisha. However with regard to embracing and kissing one should adopt a stringent view. also Targum to Koh. III, 5 — R. A. Eger. She is permitted to eat with him from the same dish, on the authority of RaBaD , derived from Ket. 4b. In the case of a menstruous woman this would be forbidden (Mishna, Shab. 11a). and she is [also] permitted to sleep with him, [provided] he [is] in his garment and she [is] in her garment.. However, since we say, 'take a roundabout route, O, Nazirite, [and do not come near the vineyard'], one should adopt a stringent view, so that he should not sleep [with her] in the [same] bed at all.

    במה דברים אמורים בשאר אבלות אבל אם מת אביו של חתן או אמה של כלה שמכניסין את המת לחדר ואת החתן ואת הכלה לחופה ובועל בעילת מצוה ופורש ונוהגים ז' ימי המשתה ואח"כ שבעת ימי אבלות אסור להתייחד עמה כל י"ד יום אלא הוא ישן בין האנשים והיא ישנה בין הנשים כדאיתא בסימן שמ"ב אבל אם כנס לחופה והתחילו ימי המשתה שלו ואח"כ מת לו מת מותר להתייחד עמה כמו בשאר אבלות והוא שבעל אבל אם לא בעל אסור להתייחד עמה כל ימי האבל בין בחול בין בשבת:

    The [above ruling] applies only with respect to [all] other [cases] of mourning, but if the father of the bridegroom died, or the mother of the bride, [in which case], they bring the corpse into a room, and the bridegroom and the bride into a bridal chamber, and he performs the dutiful marital act, and [then] separates [himself from her], and they observe [first] the seven days of the [wedding-] feast and after that [they observe] the seven days of mourning, § 342 and notes. —[the law is that] he is forbidden to be alone with her throughout the fourteen days, [and] he sleeps only among the men and she sleeps among the women as is stated in § 34 in par. 1) might lead him to treat this case lightly (Ket. 4b). But if he [already] married her and the days of the [wedding-] feast had begun, and subsequently he suffered a bereavement, he is permitted to be alone with her as in [all] the other [cases] of mourning, implied in Ket. ibid. In this case the seven days of the wedding-feast began legally and are not the result of leniency. Likewise, if one suffered a bereavement on a Festival, he is permitted to be alone with his wife (v. infra § 399, 2 Gloss ), for here too, the Festival sets in by itself and the question of leniency is not involved. Furthermore, the joy experienced on a Festival is not as great as in the case of a groom — ShaK. provided he had cohabited with her; however, if he had not cohabited with her, he is forbidden to be alone with her throughout the days of mourning, whether on a weekday or on a Sabbath.

    English translation: Code of Hebrew Law by Chaim N. Denburg, Montreal, 1955 · CC-BY