Commentary page
Shulchan Arukh, Orach Chayim 656
This page gathers the commentary on one source unit: the classic commentaries as they are printed, the sources the text cites, the sages named in it and direct links back to the text.
Read the full text in the readerOrach Chayim Siman 656
Orach Chayim Siman 656 is a source-text unit from the Shulchan Arukh with 1 seifim. Its reading map separates the practical rule, its conditions and the points that need comparison with the surrounding text.
What to track
Read each seif as a separate step. Identify the action, the condition that limits it and any distinction between cases before moving to the next seif.
Study lens
Look for rabbinic statements and attributed teachings. The source text remains the primary evidence; this note offers a structured way to enter it rather than replacing close reading.
- rabbinic statements and attributed teachings
Continue the sequence
Parallel sources
Lessons and study tools
A unit-by-unit map of all 1 seifim on this page: opening words, the moves the text actually makes and a link back to that exact seif.
- Seif 1107 words
Opens “שצריך לחזור אחד הידור מצוה בקנית האתרוג.…”
Named: רב וכמו.
Original text
<b>שצריך לחזור אחד הידור מצוה בקנית האתרוג. ובו סעיף אחד:</b><br>אם קנה אתרוג שראוי לצאת בו בצמצום כגון שהוא כביצה מצומצמת ואח"כ מצא גדול ממנו מצוה להוסיף עד שליש מלגיו בדמי הראשון כדי להחליפו ביותר נאה ויש מי שאומר שאם מוצא שני אתרוגים לקנות והאחד הדור מחבירו יקח ההדר אם אין מייקרים אותו יותר משליש מלגיו בדמי חבירו: הגה מי שאין לו אתרוג או שאר מצוה עוברת אין צריך לבזבז עליה הון רב וכמו שאמרו המבזבז אל יבזבז יותר מחומש אפי' מצוה עוברת [הרא"ש ורבינו ירוחם נ"י ח"ב] ודוקא מצות עשה אבל לא תעשה יתן כל ממונו קודם שיעבור [הרשב"א וראב"ד] [וע' לקמן סוף סי' תרנ"ח בהגה]:
One must pursue beautification of the mitzvah when buying an etrog: If one bought an etrog that can just barely fulfill the obligation, i.e. if it was exactly an egg-size, and afterward found a bigger one, it is a mitzvah to pay up to a third more than the price of the first to swap it out for the nicer one. There is one who says that if there are two etrogs available for purchase, one nicer than the other, the nicer one should be purchased if it is not more than a third more expensive than the other one. RAMA: Somebody who doesn't have an etrog or some other [objected associated with a] mitzvah whose time will elapse need not dispense much wealth on it, as they said, "One who dispenses [money to charity] should not dispense more than one-fifth [of their wealth]" [Ketubot 50a], even with respect to a mitzvah with a time that will elapse (Ros"h, Rabbeinu Yerucham 13:2). This specifically applies to a positive mitzvah. However, regarding a negative mitzvah, one should spend all of their wealth rather than sin (Rashb"a and Raavad). See the end of 658 in the Rama.
English translation: Sefaria Community Translation · CC0